Thursday, March 3, 2016

AP English Language and Composition Summer Work 2015



AP English Language and Composition                                      
 Summer 2015                                                                                                                                           Mr. Konkoly
                
This course studies non-fiction writing and the art of persuasion. The summer work provides initial practice and some shared material on which we can build.
                                                                                                                                         
Reading
Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking by Malcolm Gladwell
The Boys in the Boat: Nine Americans and Their Epic Quest for Gold at the 1936 Berlin Olympics by Daniel James Brown
Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare
You will have to buy and share the books or get them through the library.
Julius Caesar also can be read at http://www.folgerdigitaltexts.org/PDF/JC.pdf.

Writing
1. Write a personal essay about the meaning and definition of family. Use your own experiences or the experiences of people you know. Feel free to include any knowledge you have from history, current events, or popular culture. You do not have to give a final or exhaustive definition of family. Your essay might define some component of family or explore particular issues about family.
A personal essay is a form of writing in which an author explores and shares the meaning of experience and relates this experience to ideas. Although personal, the essay need not focus on the author. The subject and purpose could be anything.  The author’s presence is apparent through the reflection on the subject and the way details and stories are presented.
Your typed, double-spaced essay should be 750-1000 words. It should be a polished essay, not a first draft, but it is alright if you still have misgivings about some aspect of it.  Include an informative and engaging title.

2. Read Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking by Malcolm Gladwell.

Consider the following passages from Gladwell’s book:
“The key to good decision making is not knowledge. It is understanding. We are swimming in the former. We are desperately lacking in the latter.”
“We have, as human beings, a storytelling problem. We’re a bit too quick to come up with explanations for things we don’t really have an explanation for.”
“Insight is not a lightbulb that goes off inside our heads. It is a flickering candle that can easily be snuffed out.”
Write an essay in which you explain at least one of the above claims made by Gladwell, present his reasoning and evidence, and take your own stand on the issues that he raises. You might agree with him and provide further support. You might disagree and present your arguments that challenge his views. You also might partially agree and disagree. You may address all three passages, but you should focus on one.
Your typed, double-spaced essay should be 750-1000 words. Include a title and heading.

3. Read The Boys in the Boat by Daniel James Brown.
The Boys in the Boat is non-fiction, but it reads like a novel, focusing on the story of Joe Rantz and the University of Washington crew team. The narrative is complemented by historical knowledge about the 1930s and scientific knowledge about the physics of rowing and boat design and the physiology of rowing. You can imagine that Brown must have done historical and scientific research.
Select one specific part of the book in which Brown presents historical knowledge or science. Write an essay in which you analyze how Brown presents that material and what it contributes to both the narrative and the themes of the book.  In other words, why do you think Brown added that research to the story he is telling and how does he incorporate it?
Your typed, double-spaced essay should be 750-1000 words. Include a title and heading.

4. Read Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. Write a eulogy for Brutus, Cassius, or Portia. Study the eulogies for Caesar by Brutus and Antony as examples.  As the person delivering the eulogy, identify who is speaking (a specific character or type of person from the play) and to whom you are speaking. Also think about the emotional effect you want to have on your audience. You also need to pay attention to the topics you will address, how you will organize the eulogy, and your tone and word choices.
Your typed, double-spaced eulogy should be 300-500 words.


Deadlines and Submission Guidelines
1. The essay response to either Blink or The Boys in the Boat is due by July 24.
2. The other of those two essays is due by August 28.
3. The personal essay and the eulogy are due by September 1.

 Please submit all work to turnitin.com.  Always save copies of your work for yourself!

The class ID is 10116857; the enrollment password is konkoly.




Help
Feel free to email me (dkonkoly@hwrsd.org) with questions after you first try consulting a classmate.  I will check email periodically, so you might not get an immediate reply.  Don’t save your questions for the last minute!
Assessment and Grading

The personal essay should have a clear subject, use specific details, include moments of reflection, and have an engaging and engaged voice. You will receive full credit for an essay that meets these criteria and a final grade will be given after you complete more work on the essay in the fall. Essays that are sloppy in their writing or organization and not proofread are not acceptable and will not receive summer credit. The summer version counts as homework/coursework and the final version counts as an essay grade.
The eulogy should have a clear beginning, middle, and end. You should effectively move an audience to believe your depiction of the character and to feel particular emotions. The language you use should be appropriate for the circumstances and audience. Eulogies that are not at least 300 words or that do not show an accurate understanding of the character and play will not receive full credit. The eulogy counts in the homework/coursework portion of the grade.

The essays in response to the two books will be evaluated as follows and the grades count as an essay grade for the first term:


advanced
proficient   
developing
inadequate
Presents and develops a coherent and thoughtful perspective in response to the prompt.




Shows an accurate and insightful understanding of the book.  




Provides relevant and sufficient details to support your claims.




Explains supporting details in relation to the overall development of your essay.




Use of language (sentence clarity and variety; precise and appropriate vocabulary)




Demonstrates mastery of Standard English conventions, including citations.




Typewritten, double-spaced and 750-1000 words; on time.





Tuesday, June 17, 2014

AP Summer Work 2014



AP English 3                                          Summer 2014                                       Ms. Keyser 
                                                                                                                             Mr. Konkoly

Overview:  You are reading a brief article, three essays, and two books.  You are writing three reflections and three essays. Plagiarism is not tolerated and will be given consequences according to school policy.

The article and essays, or links to them, can be found at http://dkonkoly.blogspot.com
You also will find other helpful materials there. Plus, you can use the comment option to pose questions and reply to each other.

You will have to get the two books through the library (cwmars.org is a website to use to request a book using your library card), buy them, or share them.
Reading and Reflecting as a Writer

Read the article “What Do Students Need to Know about Rhetoric?” to develop an understanding of rhetoric.  Then use your understanding as you read each of the essays listed below.  Have your marked up copy of that essay with you on the first day.


For any THREE of the essays, write a typed 1-2 page, single-spaced (max. 500 words) reflection in which you articulate and explain your understanding of some of the “rhetorical decisions” the author makes by applying the ideas from “What Do Students Need to Know About Rhetoric?.” You are being asked to read the essay as a writer, to imagine the composition of the essay in light of the rhetorical dimensions of all compositions.


Chang-Rae Lee, “Coming Home Again”
Scott Russell Sanders, “Under the Influence”
Judy Brady, “I Want a Wife”
George Orwell, “Shooting an Elephant”
Mark Twain, “Two Ways of Seeing a River”

Your Own Personal Essay

Write a cohesive personal essay that includes the following elements in any order: Using narrative technique, describe two or three events from the last year that illustrate your relationship with technology. Include reflections on your relationship with technology and your thoughts on its benefits and detriments.
Your typed, single-spaced essay should be 750-1000 words. It should be a polished essay, not a first draft, but it is all right if you still have misgivings about some aspect of it.



The Art of Nonfiction  

You will write an essay in response to each text. Each typed, single-spaced essay should be 750-1000 words.

1. Read Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other by Sherry Turkle.

Identify at least three core arguments that Turkle presents and fully develops. In what ways does she use language (word choice, sentences, structure of the book, or other strategies) to convince the reader of her ideas? Evaluate her argument: in what ways is it convincing? What ideas or perspectives does she minimize or leave out that would contradict her argument?

2. Read Behind the Beautiful Forevers: Life, Death, and Hope in a Mumbai Undercity by Katherine Boo.
In an interview, Katherine Boo was asked, "What was it about the stories you tell in this book that appealed to you more than other stories you saw or heard in Annawadi? How did you choose the people you would write about?" She replied: "When I start a project, I follow as many people as I can–go where they go, do what they do, whether they’re teaching kindergarten or stealing metal scrap or running a household. The larger the pool of people I get to know, the better I can distinguish between anomalous experiences and shared ones. As a writer I’m not looking to tell the most flamboyant tales, nor to describe only the most virtuous and super-talented people. I’m looking for resonant stories—stories that might illuminate something about the structure of a society. And it’s difficult to predict in the beginning which individuals’ experiences, months or years later, will come to shed that light."

Select one of the people about whom Boo writes. Write an essay in which you analyze what the depiction of that person reveals about the structure of society in Annawadi. Make sure to include your observations regarding how Boo writes about that person (for example, the details she chooses and the words she uses).
Help
Feel free to email your teacher with questions after you first have tried consulting a classmate (wkeyser@hwrsd.org or dkonkoly@hwrsd.org).  We will be checking email periodically, so you might not get an immediate reply.  Don’t save your questions for the last minute!

Deadlines and Submission Guidelines
Always save copies of your work for yourself!

1. One essay reflection and the personal essay are due July 12th.  (This will allow us to get back to you if your work shows the need for corrective feedback or instruction. We might ask you to submit a second reflection if we think that will help.)

2.  Response to Behind the Beautiful Forevers: Life, Death, and Hope in a Mumbai Undercity is due on August 2nd.

3. The other two reflections and the essay response to Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other are due on August 25th.

 Please submit all work to turnitin.com.  

Ms. Keyser’s class: The class ID is 8153309; the enrollment password is keyser.
Mr. Konkoly’s class: The class ID is 8153340; the enrollment password is konkoly.

Assessment and Grading

The essay reflections should demonstrate an accurate understanding of the text, attention to details of the text, insights into rhetorical decisions, and an explanation of those insights using evidence.  By meeting these criteria and completing all of the reflections, your work will be proficient or exemplary and will receive full credit for grading purposes.  This grade is part of the homework/coursework category of your grade.

The personal essay should have a clear subject, use specific details, include moments of reflection, and have an engaging and engaged voice. You will receive full credit for an essay that meets these criteria and a final grade will be given after you complete more work on the essay in the fall. Essays that are sloppy in their writing or organization and not proofread are not acceptable and will not receive summer credit. The summer version counts as homework/coursework and the final version counts as an essay grade.

The essays in response to the two books will be evaluated as follows and the grades count as an essay grade for the first term:


advanced
proficient   
developing
inadequate
Presents and develops a coherent and thoughtful perspective in response to the prompt.




Shows an accurate and insightful understanding of the book.  




Provides relevant and sufficient details to support your claims.




Explains supporting details in relation to the overall development of your essay.




Use of language (sentence clarity and variety; precise and appropriate vocabulary)




Demonstrates mastery of Standard English conventions, including citations.




Typewritten, double-spaced and 750-1000 words; on time.